BarbriSFCourseDetails
BarbriPdBannerMessage

Course Details

This CLE webinar will discuss the meaning of neurodiversity, the ethical and systemic implications of how neurodiverse individuals participate within the legal education system and profession, and best practices for individuals and entities when working with neurodiverse students and colleagues. 

Faculty

Description

In a recent survey, 25 percent of law students identified as neurodivergent, compared to eight percent of attorneys in the same study. ABA and NDLPA show only five percent of lawyers profess to have a disability. A UK study showed that in the legal profession, nearly half of the individuals acknowledging neurodiversity reported disability-related discrimination during their training and education. The legal education system and profession attract neurodivergent talent but can do better in supporting the progress of this talent towards professional success.  


Traditional hiring tools, emphasis on "cultural fit," and normative performance measurements disfavor neurodivergent candidates. A broad lack of understanding, accommodation, and accessibility towards the neurodivergent challenges law students and attorneys. Ironically, positive messaging about neurodiversity emphasizes strengths like attention to detail or hyper-focus but minimizes other challenges.


Listen as our expert panel addresses how to recognize and disrupt neurodivergent biases, increase our understanding of neurodiversity, and apply inclusive practices during legal education and practice. Explore accommodations, communications, and other best practices in this area.

Outline

I. Introduction to neurodiversity and bias

A. Defining neurodiversity: including ADHD, autism spectrum, dyslexia, OCD, Tourette's, and others

B. Implicit, structural, and cultural biases toward neurodivergent persons

II. Bias in legal settings

A. Law school admissions and academic success

B. Bar exam and fitness for practice

C. Hiring, onboarding, and accommodations / adjustments

D. Leveraging abilities for retention and advancement

III. Legal and ethical framework

A. MRPC 1.1 (competence), 1.4 (communication), 8.4(g) (bias)

B. ADA, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and applicable state and local laws

C. Limitations on requiring disclosure and self-disclosure options

IV. Tools to eliminate bias

A. Proactive vs. reactive

B. Adapting communications

C. Support, including but not only through accommodations / adjustments

D. Recruitment and retention, including possibly through neurodiversity-focused initiatives

E. Accessibility

V. Reducing stigma, recognizing intersectionality with race, gender, and class

VII. Conclusion and resources with Q&A


Benefits

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • Understanding neurodiversity and its attributes
  • Recognizing the subtle and overt ways in which bias impacts hiring, training, and advancement
  • Applying inclusive practices during law school and in legal practice
  • Identifying accommodations and structural reforms to enhance neurodivergent inclusivity