BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Class Action and Other Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

Hostile LLC Breakups: Pre-Suit Planning and Litigation Tactics When Exiting an LLC With Archaic Documents

Navigating Ambiguous, Repealed, or Modified Remedies

$297.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

When limited liability companies were first gaining widespread traction generations ago, LLC operating agreements were often created with form templates of the time that contained few or no mechanisms for providing an exiting member with the fair value of the membership interests or for resolving membership disputes. As long as the original members were running things, this arrangement was not an issue. But now, sometimes several decades after formation of an LLC, the membership interests have been passed on to a second or even third generation who no longer wish to continue in the business or with the current members.

Disputes often result in the controlling member(s) stopping distributions or denying other members access to the company's books and records. When an excluded member wishes to withdraw or otherwise enforce their rights under these circumstances, careful negotiation and pre-litigation planning are required. When the members are related or have ongoing connections, emotions play a large role.

Where the operating agreement is silent, and many older OAs are, the parties' rights and remedies are defined by statute, which can be ambiguous and untested and may implicate laws that have since been amended or modified. If disputes appear headed to litigation, however, many complex issues need to be considered, and alternative plans and strategies need to be considered before suit is filed.

Listen as our experienced panel discusses how to navigate exiting an LLC with outdated operating agreements or under the statutory default procedures where the member interests may be owned by second or third generation owners.

Presented By

Kenneth W. W. Clingen
Partner
Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC

Mr. Clingen chairs the firm’s business counseling department. He is general counsel to a number of privately owned businesses across a variety of industries and also represents high net worth individuals and family offices. He counsels clients in starting new business ventures, operating their ongoing business enterprises and preparing business succession plans for business owners.

Jason Kosek
Shareholder
Anderson Kill

Mr. Kosek is a shareholder in Anderson Kill's New York office. He assists clients in a broad array of issues, including insurance coverage, regulatory, FCPA, labor law, negligence, nuisance, trespass, products liability and breach of contract, with a focus on construction and regulatory matters.

Keith A. Lazere
Shareholder
Anderson Kill

Mr. Lazere is a shareholder in Anderson Kill’s New York office and also serves as the firm's Deputy General Counsel. He focuses his practice on Corporate and Commercial Litigation at the trial and appellate levels in state and federal court. Mr. Lazere represents clients in sophisticated commercial and business litigations involving business torts, fraud, breach of contract, corporate and partnership disputes and debtor and creditor rights. His extensive litigation experience encompasses business arenas including real estate, construction, aviation, hospitality, maritime, media, technology, finance and insurance.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, March 25, 2025

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. Introduction
    1. What provisions are most likely to have been omitted
    2. Why were they likely omitted
  2. Common exit mechanisms in older operating agreements
  3. Statutory default rules
    1. Obtaining documents
    2. Exit rules
  4. Tactics for members desiring to exit

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What options exist when laws referred to in the operating agreement have been amended or even repealed?
  • What are practical ways to open negotiations without exacerbating difficult emotions?
  • What modern business maneuvers, not in existence when the OAs were created, pose the most challenges?