Rule 68 Offers of Judgment in Putative Class Actions: Litigation Strategies After Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
Evaluating Choice of Jurisdiction, Use of Placeholder Class Certification Motions, and Impact of Pick-Off Strategy

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
- work Practice Area
Class Action and Other Litigation
- event Date
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE course will examine the strategic use of Rule 68 offers of judgment in class actions in the aftermath of the 2016 Supreme Court decision Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, holding that an unaccepted offer of judgment generally does not moot a plaintiff's case. The panel will also address leveraging Rule 68 as an early case defense strategy; and considerations regarding choice of jurisdiction and the use of placeholder certification motions to proactively avoid an offer of judgment.
Faculty

Mr. Schwartz is a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. He represents clients in purported class actions, multidistrict litigation and mass tort proceedings in federal and state courts. Mr. Schwartz has successfully represented an array of product manufacturers at both the trial and appellate levels. His briefings have resulted in the dismissal of multiple product liability and consumer fraud actions on the pleadings, at summary judgment and at the class certification stage. Mr. Schwartz also has successfully defended pharmaceutical companies in litigation commenced by state attorneys general alleging violations of consumer protection laws. In addition to representing companies in proceedings involving pharmaceutical and consumer products, he has represented the United States Chamber Institute for Legal Reform and the Product Liability Advisory Council, drafting amicus briefs on their behalf in cases affecting American businesses and product manufacturers. In September 2021, Mr. Schwartz provided expert testimony on behalf of the United States Chamber Institute for Legal Reform before the Ohio Senate Judiciary Committee regarding third-party litigation funding. He also has authored articles and white papers pertaining to various litigation reform measures, including proposals related to multidistrict litigation, class actions and third-party litigation funding. Mr. Schwartz has written extensively on developments in the law governing personal jurisdiction and other aspects of civil procedure.

Mr. Wyatt is a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. He represents clients in product liability, class action, and False Claims Act litigation, with extensive experience at both the trial and appellate levels. Mr. Wyatt defends companies as part of a team that focuses on global litigation strategy, trial, and law and motions practice in complex proceedings in federal and state courts. He has represented an array of companies in proceedings involving medical, industrial and consumer products. Mr. Wyatt's experience spans a range of different cases. He has extensive litigation experience in state and federal courts, including courts of appeals and the United States Supreme Court. He has been successful in securing appellate victories in several cases for his clients, including at the interlocutory stage, often establishing new precedents that bear favorably on related cases in ongoing proceedings. Mr. Wyatt also has extensive experience handling expert motion issues. He has developed strategies for defeating highly complex but speculative and unscientific theories and disrupting mass proceedings. Mr. Wyatt also has worked with defense experts to develop reports and prepare for depositions in order to implement those strategies, taking a lead role in motion practice concerning the admissibility of expert testimony. He publishes frequently on matters relevant to his practice, including on issues relating to multidistrict litigation and class action procedure, among other things. Mr. Wyatt has been named as a leading lawyer in Chambers USA since 2021. In 2013, he received the Burton Award for Legal Achievement, which recognizes excellence in legal scholarship.
Description
Defendants have used offers of judgment as part of a strategy to put settlement pressure on plaintiffs and potentially moot class actions. In 2016, SCOTUS decided Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, resolving a significant circuit split and holding that an unaccepted offer of judgment does result in mootness of the named plaintiff’s claims. But Campbell-Ewald only dealt with the discrete question of whether the named plaintiff's case was mooted. Class claims were not addressed, nor were accepted offers of judgment. The Court specifically left open the possibility of mootness if a defendant tenders the full amount of the plaintiff's individual claim, and the court then enters judgment for the plaintiff.
Courts have since taken divergent approaches to address these questions. Courts finding that full tender moots a named plaintiff’s claim have used different approaches depending on the payment method. Even when a full and tendered offer of judgment has mooted a named plaintiff’s claims, courts have split on the legal implications for the overall class.
Counsel for both sides must formulate strategies regarding the best jurisdiction for litigating their case. Plaintiff's counsel should weigh whether to use placeholder certification motions to proactively managing Rule 68 offers of judgment. Defense counsel must also evaluate the long-term impact of using Rule 68 offers of judgment to dispose of named plaintiffs' claims and future class litigation.
Listen as our authoritative panel of class litigators discusses how Rule 68 offers of judgment are being strategically used by defense counsel to attempt to dispose of putative class actions. The panel will review the latest case law addressing the issue and best practices for the plaintiff and defense counsel in light of the growing circuit court split.
Outline
- Rule 68 offers of judgment--overview; impact of Campbell-Ewald and subsequent cases
- Strategic considerations for Rule 68 offers of judgment
- For defendants
- For plaintiffs
Benefits
The panel will review these and other vital questions:
- What is the impact of the Supreme Court's Campbell-Ewald ruling and its progeny for defense counsel seeking to use Rule 68 offers of judgment to moot putative class actions?
- What are the strategic advantages of a Rule 68 offer of judgment for defendants in class litigation?
- What are some considerations for defense counsel evaluating whether to make a Rule 68 offer of judgment in putative class actions?
- What are some strategic considerations for the plaintiff's counsel for anticipating and proactively dealing with Rule 68 offers of judgment?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

How to Prepare to Take a Deposition: Guidance for New Attorneys
Available On-Demand

Product Liability Litigation Arising From Lithium-Ion Batteries: Guidance and Strategies for Proving Claims
Thursday, April 10, 2025
1:00 PM E.T.
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development